<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ldscio.org/2008/06/12/new-blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ldscio.org/2008/06/12/new-blog/</link>
	<description>Chief Information Officer for The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 01:33:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://www.ldscio.org/2008/06/12/new-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-1931</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 16:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ldscio.org/?p=110#comment-1931</guid>
		<description>What is with the &quot;.com&quot; extension? One of the things that Web 2.0 brought to the table was accepting that not everything is a .com. Not a big deal, but I would guess that LDS Media Talk is not for profit and the .org extension would fit better. Splitting hairs I guess...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is with the &#8220;.com&#8221; extension? One of the things that Web 2.0 brought to the table was accepting that not everything is a .com. Not a big deal, but I would guess that LDS Media Talk is not for profit and the .org extension would fit better. Splitting hairs I guess&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
